What’s going on at Samsung’s semiconductor division? To state the launch of their Exynos 2200 flagship mobile chipset is a fiasco is definitely an understatement. The initial The month of january 11 launch date came and went with no peep, while Samsung pulled social networking posts mentioning the date to pay for its tracks. Samsung then told us it would unveil the Exynos 2200 concurrently with a brand new smartphone, presumably the Universe S22, just for the chipset to produce individually distinct just not much later.
Botched marketing? Possibly, however it seems like there’s more into it than that now. The Exynos 2200 ought to be a substantial launch for Samsung – it’s the very first mobile processor with hardware ray tracing support and also the same RDNA2 architecture that forces popular consoles. If it is not an achievement to rub inside your competitor’s faces, I do not understand what is. Rather, we’ve observed a nearly secretive launch. Samsung provides the minimum of detail around the chipset and it has given nothing away regarding performance expectations. During the time of writing, we have no idea the chip’s CPU clock speeds.
Samsung claims there aren’t any issues with the Exynos 2200 regarding production or performance, but that’s more and more difficult to believe. Although we’re still anticipating the chipset to look within the Universe S22 series, it could feature inside a more limited capacity than initially expected. My expectations have hit very cheap, and Samsung’s mixed messaging isn’t very reassuring in either case.
- Join individuals knowledgable with this roundup from the top Samsung news every week.
- current email address
Exactly what do the rumors say?
Exynos 2200 nick
Oddly for any chipset launch of any sort, Samsung declined to divulge clock speed information because of its CPU or GPU configurations, not to mention performance estimations. We have no idea Samsung’s expectations for that new Exynos 2200 when compared to previous generation Exynos 2100.
With minimal information associated Samsung’s official launch, we’re playing the rumor mill as our only peek at what might be happening behind the curtain. Although leakers are frequently a pessimistic bunch at the very best of occasions, there has been consistent grumblings about Samsung’s Exynos development in the last twelve several weeks.
Samsung’s botched launch has let rumors run unchecked.
The most recent tips from serial tipster Ice World hint at heat and clock speed difficulties with the Exynos 2200’s Xclipse 920 GPU that’s brought Samsung to throttle back performance. Likewise, leaked benchmarks advise a significant performance deficit from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Adreno GPU. If true, this could pressure Samsung to backpedal on its performance claims and may explain the possible lack of detail provided out of this abnormally quiet launch.
On the related note, initial benchmarking from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Dimensity 9000 shows a potential cause. Based on reports, Qualcomm’s CPU setup consumes 15-20% more power than Mediatek’s, despite utilizing the same Arm Cortex core layout and other alike clock speeds. The main difference seems in the future lower to Qualcomm’s utilisation of the Samsung 4nm manufacturing node versus Mediatek’s utilization of TSMC’s 4nm equivalent. Samsung is manufacturing its very own Exynos 2200, which report might partly explain its very own rumored energy-efficiency problems. Other rumors hint at low yields from Samsung 4nm, further suggesting the fabrication process may not be where Samsung wants so that it is.
The rumor mill suggests Exynos 2200 performance and production problems, which Samsung denies.
Obviously, its smart to deal with many of these rumors having a pinch of salt. In the end, debate will get the clicks, also it always is effective be pessimistic instead of positive when creating claims. But if there is a grain of truth to a few of these reports, it paints an image that production may not be running as easily as Samsung’s semiconductor division wants us to think.
Samsung Exynos: Past troubled launches
Samsung Universe S10 rear camera module
Regrettably, the current situation feels very familiar to individuals who’ve adopted Samsung’s Exynos development through the years. Samsung’s previous dabble in custom development using its in-house Mongoose CPU cores also created hit or miss performance results, resulting in their eventual cancellation.
Possibly the greatest trouble with Mongoose was it led to notable performance and power consumption discrepancies between Exynos and Snapdragon versions of Universe S series smartphones. Samsung happens to be keen to prevent any insinuation that Universe S flagships have two tiers based on which chipset ships in almost any given region. Ditching Mongoose for Cortex CPUs and Mali for any supposedly more performant AMD GPU was designed to finish this comparison, but it’s shaping as much as did quite contrary.