Samsung finally announced the Exynos 2200 now, to be the processor which will power a few of the company’s flagship phones in 2022. It is also the very first major smartphone processor to get an AMD GPU, marking a brand new era of sorts for that Korean brand.
We would have liked to be aware what readers considered the brand new processor’s specs though, posting a poll inside our announcement article. Here’s the way you voted during this survey.
Exactly what do you consider the Exynos 2200 in writing?
Almost 1,000 votes were tallied within this poll by writing, and apparently , 77.41% of respondents think Samsung’s new processor looks hot in writing.
It’s easy to determine why people voted such as this, because the Exynos 2200 provides a effective octa-core CPU theoretically (one Cortex-X2, three Cortex-A710, and 4 Cortex-A510), potentially beefy graphics, and a few impressive multimedia abilities.
Meanwhile, 22.59% of polled readers estimate that the Exynos 2200 doesn’t seem like a warm prospect in writing. A minumum of one readers comment shows that Samsung has unsuccessful to provide around the commitment of its Exynos chipsets for quite some time now.
We are able to appreciate this stance, because the Exynos 2100 and Exynos 990 were both inferior towards the equivalent Qualcomm processor if this found the GPU particularly. Samsung is pinning its hopes on AMD graphics, but Qualcomm’s new Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 makes a significant stride too.
In either case, we’re keen to determine real-world results once Exynos 2200-powered Samsung phones hit the industry.
Kira: Finally !! The higher the competition,the greater it’s for that customers.
Nikita M: Pixel pathetic following this
Avieshek: So, it can’t really record at 120fps for 4K just disables HDR – no question it can’t do 8K at 60fps, missed chance to aid VVC/h.266 and it is where I’m afraid Snapdragon might have better responses making this news with battery efficiency although the setup generally is exactly the same despite MediaTek.
Joe Black: I merely don’t care anymore. Competitive Exynos is great and all sorts of, but thinking about almost every other SOC is reaching for almost exactly the same efficiency, I’m more curious, when we ever visit a advance software wise. Getting a animal SOC within our phones and tablets certainly seamless comfort, having the ability to use stated power would feel even better… as well as Samsung history of failing Exynos promises since 2015.
sachouba: I’m wanting to begin to see the power use of this SoC. At any given time when almost any SoC is effective enough for many applications, it’s time for you to see whether it’s power-efficient enough for any smartphone to last a minimum of 1.five days – unlike most Snapdragon 888-powered smartphones.